At last, <a href="http://www.ufomaps.com/" target="new">a sensible use of Googlemaps!</a>

Using UFO data from <a href="http://www.nuforc.org/" target="new" >National UFO Reporting Center</a>

From <a href="http://www.ufomaps.com/" target="new">the site</a>:

Q: But UFOs aren't real?
A: Maybe so, however the sighting reports are real.

Q: So aren't you tracking sighting reports on a map?
A: No, we track the cities where the reports indicate that a sighting took place. Tracking the reports would mean that we would track the cities from where the reports were submitted, and that would not make sense.

Q: But it would still be a map, and you would still be tracking UFOs
A: No, we would be tracking UFO reports, which we are not. We are tracking the cities of interest where UFOs were sawn as told by the reports, not the reports themselves.

Q: seed
A: sighted

Q: right. But since it's an established fact that UFO sighting reports are filled out by UFOs to divert the UFO trackers' attention to any other place than the one where the UFOs are located, in order to confuse and disorganize the UFO tracking efforts, would it not make more sense to track the places from where the reports where submitted, instead of the places that these report indicate?
A: Good point. We are not to judge if the reports are filled by UFOs, and that actually might be an interesting thing to plot on a map. So, could this be meta-ufomaps.com?