<em><strong>Continuing our cetacean <a href="http://www.strangeattractor.co.uk/further/?p=736" target="_blank">theme</a>, a piece on whale brains:</strong></em>

They're bigger than ours, so <a href="http://science-community.sciam.com/thread.jspa?threadID=300006091" target="_blank">are they smarter?</a>

<em>'We humans pride ourselves on our big brains. We never seem to tire of bragging about how our supreme intelligence empowers us to lord over all other animals on the planet. Yet the biological facts don't quite square with Homo sapiens' arrogance. The fact is, people do not have the largest brains on the planet, either in absolute size or in proportion to body size. Whales, not people, have the biggest brains of any animal on earth.</em>

<em>Just how smart are whales? Why do they have such big brains? Bigger is not always better; maybe the inflated whale brain is not very sophisticated on a cellular level. We're closer to answering such questions now, for a couple of recent papers address them squarely. What they find is helping separate fact from fiction.'</em>

More cetacean speculation at <a href="http://science-community.sciam.com/thread.jspa?threadID=300006091" target="_blank">Scientific American.</a>

<a href="http://science-community.sciam.com/thread.jspa?threadID=300006091" target="_blank"></a><em><strong>Elsewhere in the cosmos: </strong></em>

<em>you yourself reading this article are more likely to be some momentary fluctuation in a field of matter and energy out in space than a person with a real past born through billions of years of evolution in an orderly star-spangled cosmos. Your memories and the world you think you see around you are illusions...</em>

...in the last couple of years there has been a growing stream of debate and dueling papers, replete with references to such esoteric subjects as reincarnation, multiple universes and even the death of spacetime, as cosmologists try to square the predictions of their cherished theories with their convictions that we and the universe are real. The basic problem is that across the eons of time, the standard theories suggest, the universe can recur over and over again in an endless cycle of big bangs, but it’s hard for nature to make a whole universe. It’s much easier to make fragments of one, like planets, yourself maybe in a spacesuit or even — in the most absurd and troubling example — a naked brain floating in space.

<strong><em>Big brain theory over at the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/science/15brain.html" target="_blank">NYT</a> </em></strong>

<em>And, at the water's edge, a musical interlude from SA pal <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=ILPzkze3RHw&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">David Rothenberg</a>... </em>